2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Classification of Time-Variable X-Ray Sources

Abstract: To maximize the discovery potential of future synoptic surveys, especially in the field of transient science, it will be necessary to use automatic classification to identify some of the astronomical sources. The data mining technique of supervised classification is suitable for this problem. Here, we present a supervised learning method to automatically classify variable X-ray sources in the second XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalog (2XMMi-DR2). Random Forest is our classifier of choice since it is one o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We added extra columns to estimate the source variability. This could be done directly from the light curves, as in Lo et al (2014), but as a first approach we computed only the logarithm of the ratio between maximum and mean X-ray fluxes, in the most variable energy bands (among soft 0.3-1 keV, medium 1-2 keV, and hard 2-10 keV bands). This ratio was estimated by the quan-tity P eakRate bandi /Rate bandi or P eakRate bandi /U L bandi if Rate bandi is zero, where U L bandi stands for the 3σ upper limit on the count rate, given in 2SXPS.…”
Section: Catalogmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We added extra columns to estimate the source variability. This could be done directly from the light curves, as in Lo et al (2014), but as a first approach we computed only the logarithm of the ratio between maximum and mean X-ray fluxes, in the most variable energy bands (among soft 0.3-1 keV, medium 1-2 keV, and hard 2-10 keV bands). This ratio was estimated by the quan-tity P eakRate bandi /Rate bandi or P eakRate bandi /U L bandi if Rate bandi is zero, where U L bandi stands for the 3σ upper limit on the count rate, given in 2SXPS.…”
Section: Catalogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These populations can then be used to answer questions regarding the hierarchical evolution of galaxies or how the earliest supermassive black holes formed (e.g., Greene 2012). One possible automated way to find such rare objects serendipitously is to search for outliers in the parameter space of the catalog (e.g., Lo et al 2014) within the framework of X-ray source classification. X-ray source classification can also be used for population studies, for example to study the X-ray luminosity function of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs; Mineo et al 2012), to perform quick diagnostics on an object's nature for individual studies, or to spot unstudied objects in unexpected environments (e.g., Lin et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other known parameters, such as optical to X-ray flux ratio, are used afterwards to discriminate between source classes (Pineau et al 2011;Lin et al 2012). More recent works have applied machine learning algorithms where timing parameters are the major classifying feature (Lo et al 2014;Farrell et al 2015). Around 27.1% of the EXOD detected sources did not have a previously generated light curve and thus no variability classification.…”
Section: Discoveriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gopalan et al (2015) expanded the colour-colour-intensity diagram classification technique by applying a supervised learning algorithm as a method of demarcating systems containing black holes, pulsating neutron stars, or non-pulsating neutron stars. Lo et al (2014) employed the random forest algorithm to classify time-varying X-ray sources in the Second XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source Catalog using X-ray photometric time series and spectra and multiwavelength information. Their results indicated a high classification accuracy and the ability to detect unusual objects in their test sample.…”
Section: Machine Learning For X-ray Source Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%