2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/lsc.2017.8268156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of physical exercises from wearable sensors using small dataset from non-laboratory settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that there is no universal threshold value for classifying heart rate; researchers design their own standards based on their study. Considering recommendations from previous studies, we selected 45 to 130 beats per minute (bpm) as an acceptable range for our experimental simulation (Chakraborty et al, 2015; Chowdhury et al 2017). We tested the performances of linear interpolation, Kalman, spline and Stineman interpolation.…”
Section: Initial Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that there is no universal threshold value for classifying heart rate; researchers design their own standards based on their study. Considering recommendations from previous studies, we selected 45 to 130 beats per minute (bpm) as an acceptable range for our experimental simulation (Chakraborty et al, 2015; Chowdhury et al 2017). We tested the performances of linear interpolation, Kalman, spline and Stineman interpolation.…”
Section: Initial Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there is a growing trend to model a recommendation system using these devices. Chowdhury et al (2018) [20] proposed AdaBoost-based classifier to predict suitable exercise types in real-world contexts based on a limited data for training. First, the system extracts some features from the data such as the distance and heart rate.…”
Section: B Sensor Data Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%