2015
DOI: 10.1121/1.4927695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic classification of delphinids based on the representative frequencies of whistles

Abstract: Classification of odontocete species remains a challenging task for passive acoustic monitoring. Classifiers that have been developed use spectral features extracted from echolocation clicks and whistle contours. Most of these contour-based classifiers require complete contours to reduce measurement errors. Therefore, overlapping contours and partially detected contours in an automatic detection algorithm may increase the bias for contour-based classifiers. In this study, classification was conducted on each r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, ; Roch et al . ; Lin and Chou ) and thus, we had low expectations for our ability to differentiate Delphinus species from each other (or from S. coeruleoalba ) at the event level. Although most species had high correct classification scores in the event classifier, only 71% of Delphinus capensis (Dc) events were correctly classified, with one event misclassified as Delphinus delphis (Dd) and another as Stenella coeruleoalba (Sc).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, ; Roch et al . ; Lin and Chou ) and thus, we had low expectations for our ability to differentiate Delphinus species from each other (or from S. coeruleoalba ) at the event level. Although most species had high correct classification scores in the event classifier, only 71% of Delphinus capensis (Dc) events were correctly classified, with one event misclassified as Delphinus delphis (Dd) and another as Stenella coeruleoalba (Sc).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, , Azzolin et al . ; Lin and Chou ). Nonetheless, there remains significant ambiguity in species classifications based solely on whistle characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. (Color online) The success rates from published whistle classification tests run with different numbers of species (red and blue squares show, respectively, the results of this study for the three species-classifier and the four-population classifier; Steiner, 1981;Wang et al, 1995;Matthews et al, 1999;Rendell et al, 1999;Oswald et al, 2003;Oswald et al, 2007;Roch et al, 2007;Gannier et al, 2010;Caillat, 2013;Gillespie et al, 2013;Azzolin et al, 2014;Parada and Cardenal-L opez, 2014;Lin and Chou, 2015).…”
Section: DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most often classification is based on discriminant function analysis (DFA; Rendell et al, 1999), classification and regression trees (CART; Gannier et al, 2010) or both methods (Oswald et al, 2007) using standard parameters extracted from the whistle contour, although spectral analysis has also been employed (Roch et al, 2007). Several whistle detection and classification programs have been developed (Oswald et al, 2007;Gillespie et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2012;Lin and Chou, 2015). Some, such as ROCCA (Oswald et al, 2007), require a human user to manually select high quality whistles suitable for classification, the fundamental frequency of which is then extracted and classified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%