Automatic Calibration of the Step Length Model of a Pocket INS by Means of a Foot Inertial Sensor

Abstract

All non-foot-mounted inertial localization systems have a common challenge: the need for calibrating the parameters of the step length model. The calibration of the parameters of a step length model is key for an accurate estimation of the pedestrian's step length, and therefore, for the accuracy of the position estimation. In a previous work, we provided a proof of concept on how to calibrate step length models with a foot inertial navigation system (INS), i.e., an INS based on an inertial measurement unit (IMU) mounted on the upper front part of the foot. The reason is that the foot INS does not require calibration thanks to the implementation of the strapdown algorithm. The goal of this article is to automatically calibrate the parameters of a step length model of the pocket INS by means of the foot INS. The step length model of the pocket INS has two parameters: the slope and offset of a first-order linear regression that relates the amplitude of the thigh pitch with the user's step length. Firstly, we show that it is necessary to estimate the two parameters of the step length model. Secondly, we propose a method to automatically estimate these parameters by means of a foot INS. Finally, we propose a practical implementation of the proposed method in the pocket INS. We evaluate the pocket INS with the proposed calibration method and we compare the results to the state of the art implementations of the pocket INS. The results show that the proposed automatic calibration method outperforms the previous work, which proves the need for calibrating all the parameters of the step length model of the pocket INS. In this work, we conclude that it is possible to use a foot INS to automatically calibrate all parameters of the step length model of the pocket INS. Since the calibration of the step length model is always needed, our proposed automatic calibration method is a key enabler for using the pocket INS.

Novel Multi-IMU Tight Coupling Pedestrian Localization Exploiting Biomechanical Motion Constraints

“…For this evaluation, we use the walks presented in Reference [ 37 ]. The reason why we choose these walks are because they are longer, that is, at least 15 min each.…”

“…To this day, there is no widely-adopted evaluation methodology for inertial localization systems [ 38 ]. Therefore, in this article, we use our own evaluation methodology which has been presented in detail in Reference [ 37 ]. For completeness, we present a brief summary of our evaluation methodology in the following points: our ground truth is based in ground truth points with known location.…”

Smartphone-Based Localization for Passengers Commuting in Traffic Hubs

“…Pedestrian dead-reckoning performed with inertial sensors is of high interest because of the possibility of providing localization without violating privacy, unlike camera-based systems [ 5 , 6 ]. Suitable locations of the inertial sensors are the torso [ 7 ], the shoe [ 8 , 9 ] or the pocket [ 10 , 11 ], while the inertial sensors embedded in the passenger’s smartphone can be also used.…”

Resolving Position Ambiguity of IMU-Based Human Pose with a Single RGB Camera

“…Assuming these cameras are utilized to capture human posture for the purposes of health care [ 10 , 11 ] or human–robot collaboration [ 12 ], a technique for online MoCap in a single-camera environment is desirable. Moreover, inertial sensors have become affordable, and many studies have analyzed human motion using IMUs [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Recently, IMUs have been embedded in many cellphones and smartwatches, and further spread of IMUs is expected.…”