Automatic Bone Segmentation from MRI for Real-Time Knee Tracking in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Abstract

Recent progress in real-time tracking of knee bone structures from fluoroscopic imaging using CT templates has opened the door to studying knee kinematics to improve our understanding of patellofemoral syndrome. The problem with CT imaging is that it exposes patients to extra ionising radiation, which adds to fluoroscopic imaging. This can be solved by segmenting bone templates from MRI instead of CT by using a deep neural network architecture called 2.5D U-Net. To train the network, we used the SKI10 database from the MICCAI challenge; it contains 100 knee MRIs with their corresponding annotated femur and tibia bones as the ground truth. Since patella tracking is essential in our application, the SKI10 database was augmented with a new label named UofA Patella . Using 70 MRIs from the database, a 2.5D U-Net was trained successfully after 75 epochs with an excellent final Dice score of 98%, which compared favourably with the best state-of-the-art algorithms. A test set of 30 MRIs were segmented using the trained 2.5D U-Net and then converted into 3D mesh templates by using a marching cube algorithm. The resulting 3D mesh templates were compared to the 3D mesh model extracted from the corresponding labelled data from the augmented SKI10. Even though the final Dice score (98%) compared well with the state-of-the-art algorithms, we initially found that the Euclidean distance between the segmented MRI and SKI10 meshes was over 6 mm in many regions, which is unacceptable for our application. By optimising many of the hyper-parameters of the 2.5D U-Net, we were able to find that, by changing the threshold used in the last layer of the network, one can significantly improve the average accuracy to mm with a variance of mm for most of the MRI mesh templates. These results illustrate that the Dice score is not always a good predictor of the geometric accuracy of segmentation and that fine-tuning hyper-parameters is critical for improving geometric accuracy.

Novel Technologies Used in the Assessment of Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review

“…Finite Element Analysis/Calculations/Networks/Artificial Intelligence Since our aim was finding novel technologies, studies using calculations, networks, data processing, finite element analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence are not included in this review. However, these assessment approaches seem to be receiving a lot of attention in the literature and there has been a rise in their number [60][61][62]. These methods either enable large amounts of data to be processed efficiently and yield results [63,64] or provide very detailed results from a very small number of subjects with detailed assessments [11,61,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72].…”