2006
DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-329-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Autocorrelation and Spectral Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, estimating the autocorrelation reduces to estimating the parameters of an AR model. However, because the "true" process order is unknown, a hierarchy of models with increasing order p are simultaneously estimated 9,10 . From these candidates, the best model is chosen using an information-theoretic, finite sampling model selection criterion 8 .…”
Section: A Sampling Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, estimating the autocorrelation reduces to estimating the parameters of an AR model. However, because the "true" process order is unknown, a hierarchy of models with increasing order p are simultaneously estimated 9,10 . From these candidates, the best model is chosen using an information-theoretic, finite sampling model selection criterion 8 .…”
Section: A Sampling Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitting such models to observed data has been studied extensively 3,4,[9][10][11]23 , and there are a number of available algorithms. Here, classical Burg recursion 3 is used to compute the parameters because it is less susceptible to round-off error accumulation than the more efficient recursive denominator variant 4,23 .…”
Section: A Sampling Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the scaling factor, unbiased auto-correlation functions are indefinite and have statistical and numerical disadvantages for practical applications in power spectral density estimations. They may result in negative values of power, contradicting physical interpretation and prohibiting a representation in logarithmic scale [26,[28][29][30]. This was observed by us also for unbiased RR τ and the usage of a biased estimator (superscript * )…”
Section: Power Spectral Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 64%