2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2018.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic assessment of interactive OLAP explorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of our previous works [18], we proposed an approach for detecting OLAP analyses phrased in SQL, by converting SQL queries into OLAP queries and then checking if two consecutive queries are sufficiently close in terms of OLAP operations. In our more recent work, we used supervised learning to identify a set of query features allowing to characterize focus zones in OLAP explorations [5], or to identify queries that better contribute to an exploration [4]. The present work can be seen as a continuation of those previous works, since we have the same objective as [18] and use the same technique as [4].…”
Section: Workload Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In one of our previous works [18], we proposed an approach for detecting OLAP analyses phrased in SQL, by converting SQL queries into OLAP queries and then checking if two consecutive queries are sufficiently close in terms of OLAP operations. In our more recent work, we used supervised learning to identify a set of query features allowing to characterize focus zones in OLAP explorations [5], or to identify queries that better contribute to an exploration [4]. The present work can be seen as a continuation of those previous works, since we have the same objective as [18] and use the same technique as [4].…”
Section: Workload Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In our more recent work, we used supervised learning to identify a set of query features allowing to characterize focus zones in OLAP explorations [5], or to identify queries that better contribute to an exploration [4]. The present work can be seen as a continuation of those previous works, since we have the same objective as [18] and use the same technique as [4]. The main differences with these previous works is that we make no assumption about the type of queries in the workload (particularly, they may not be multidimensional queries), and we have no ground truth (i.e., no human manual inspection of each query) on the workload.…”
Section: Workload Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations