2022
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2022.2074415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic anomaly detection from X-ray images based on autoencoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In industrial circles, X-ray is used to detect material defects or unwanted elements in other objects, which allows the detection of anomalies in the entire volume, not just on the surface. Among the works that use autoencoders for these purposes, it is worth mentioning [ 49 ], in which the quality of metal details is examined. However, this work is based on artificial data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In industrial circles, X-ray is used to detect material defects or unwanted elements in other objects, which allows the detection of anomalies in the entire volume, not just on the surface. Among the works that use autoencoders for these purposes, it is worth mentioning [ 49 ], in which the quality of metal details is examined. However, this work is based on artificial data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tokime et al used a deep learning segmentation algorithm with a SegNet network architecture for the segmentation of pores in x-ray images of welds [20]. Presenti et al developed a defect detection algorithm using a combination of an autoencoder and convolutional neural network for the defect detection directly in the x-ray projection domain [21]. While the previous references prove the ability to directly detect defects and pores in the x-ray projection domain, those methods are not directly applicable for pore detection in laser sintered parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on such sparse models have indicated both promising results ( [27] and accuracy of 100% for welds), as well as some discouraging ( [13], accuracy of 73% for aluminum casting data). Recently, DL-based approaches have started to attract attention, such as in [28] (the authors focused on industrial X-ray CT data) and industrial X-ray inspections of die-casts in [29]; both utilized autoencoders to detect anomalies in X-ray images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, many of the earlier studies showed promising results with high accuracies on test data similar to training data. However, very few [28,29] of the studies have explicitly addressed how the algorithms react when subjected to unexpected new input data far from the training distribution, so-called out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In principle, dictionary learning and sparse coding should be able to detect OOD data, though there has been very limited explicit exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%