“…Such capabilities are not available in most of the currently commercialized CPR machines. For example, Lucas-II™ (Physio-Control Inc., Lund, Sweden) compresses the center of chest for CPR, but several reports commented side-effects of the device when the position of compression is inappropriate [ 3 , 6 , 13 , 26 , 27 ]; and AutoPulse™ (Zoll Medical Corp., Chelmsford, USA) compresses overall chest area for CPR, but several reports commented the risk of damage in other organs during CPR process [ 2 , 3 , 7 , 26 , 27 ]. If the currently proposed real-time MI and power estimation algorithm is applied to the control of the CPR machine and more dedicated safety functions, as described above, are realized later, complications related to the CPR machine can be reduced because the MI variations would reflect the variations in chest features such as thoracic skeleton, ligaments, and connected muscles, and the movements of the heart, lungs, and other organs during the CPR process.…”