2012
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic and Intentional Number Processing Both Rely on Intact Right Parietal Cortex: A Combined fMRI and Neuronavigated TMS Study

Abstract: Practice and training usually lead to performance increase in a given task. In addition, a shift from intentional toward more automatic processing mechanisms is often observed. It is currently debated whether automatic and intentional processing is subserved by the same or by different mechanism(s), and whether the same or different regions in the brain are recruited. Previous correlational evidence provided by behavioral, neuroimaging, modeling, and neuropsychological studies addressing this question yielded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that the CDE had a significant hemodynamic signature in the right parietal cortex but not in the left parietal cortex is in line with some previous studies (Dehaene, 1996; Andres et al, 2005; Cohen Kadosh et al, 2012). For example, Dehaene (1996) found a right-lateralized parietal dominance for the CDE in an event-related potentials (ERPs) study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our finding that the CDE had a significant hemodynamic signature in the right parietal cortex but not in the left parietal cortex is in line with some previous studies (Dehaene, 1996; Andres et al, 2005; Cohen Kadosh et al, 2012). For example, Dehaene (1996) found a right-lateralized parietal dominance for the CDE in an event-related potentials (ERPs) study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…, which is commonly considered responsible for numerical representation (4,(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53), using an established method of functional MRI (fMRI) adaptation for the study of numerosity perception (4). Neural tuning curve shift caused by connectivity in probes.…”
Section: Sulcus (Ips)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurophysiological basis of density coding is not yet clear, but evidence from numerosity studies might provide some hints. Brain imaging studies in both human and monkey show that numerosity information is represented in parietal cortex and lateral prefrontal cortex (Cohen Kadosh, Bien, & Sack, 2012;Dormal, Andres, Dormal, & Pesenti, 2010;Harvey, Klein, Petridou, & Dumoulin, 2013;Nieder, 2012aNieder, , 2012bPiazza & Izard, 2009;Roitman, Brannon, & Platt, 2012;Santens, Roggeman, Fias, & Verguts, 2010;Tudusciuc & Nieder, 2009). Density processing might therefore also occur in these areas, given the close relationship between density and numerosity.…”
Section: Texture Density Versus Numerositymentioning
confidence: 99%