2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2019.2919327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic and Generic Periodicity Adaptation for KPI Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To carry out this process, the following two values are required: “T” : Period of the main seasonal pattern of the KPI. It can be calculated with the system proposed in [ 19 ] that was introduced in the previous section. “S” : Number of previous KPI samples that the system will use to detect new anomalous behaviors.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To carry out this process, the following two values are required: “T” : Period of the main seasonal pattern of the KPI. It can be calculated with the system proposed in [ 19 ] that was introduced in the previous section. “S” : Number of previous KPI samples that the system will use to detect new anomalous behaviors.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“T” : Period of the main seasonal pattern of the KPI. It can be calculated with the system proposed in [ 19 ] that was introduced in the previous section.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normal and abnormal are already marked in these datasets. e KPI dataset is from the AIOps Challenge held by Tsinghua University in 2018 [29]. Many Internet companies monitor the data generated by various performance indicators in order to ensure the stability of web services, such as CPU usage and server health, and other performance indicators.…”
Section: E Comparisons Of Using Different Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, online service systems, such as online shopping, Ebank, and search engines, have become an indispensable part in our daily life. Although tremendous efforts have been devoted to software service maintenance (e.g., collecting various monitoring data for a service system such as metrics [44,46,54], logs [19,31,51], traces [55], and alerts [29]), due to their large scale and complexity, incidents (i.e., unplanned interruption/outage to a service [2, 16,25]) are still inevitable, which could lead to system unavailability and huge economic loss [32]. For example, according to a recent survey [1], the average cost per hour of server downtime is between $301,000 and $400,000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%