2012
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xxxix-b1-509-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic and Generic Mosaicing of Multisensor Images: An Application to Pleiades Hr

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In the early phase of the Pleiades program, the CNES (the French Space Agency) specified and developed a fully automatic mosaicing processing unit, in order to generate satellite image mosaics under operational conditions. This tool can automatically put each input image in a common geometry, homogenize the radiometry, and generate orthomosaics using stitching lines.As the image quality commissioning phase of Pleiades1A is on-going, this mosaicing process is being tested for the first time under opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensor based methods can be split into two main categories: optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery. In case of optical imagery, the most critical issues to be addressed are the inhomogeneous radiometry related to different illumination conditions across overlapping scenes, different content such as changed agriculture or forestry and undesired objects such as clouds and shadows in the images [4]. For SAR data, several factors affect the geometric and radiometric quality of the data like terrain distortions, changes in look angles or in look directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensor based methods can be split into two main categories: optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery. In case of optical imagery, the most critical issues to be addressed are the inhomogeneous radiometry related to different illumination conditions across overlapping scenes, different content such as changed agriculture or forestry and undesired objects such as clouds and shadows in the images [4]. For SAR data, several factors affect the geometric and radiometric quality of the data like terrain distortions, changes in look angles or in look directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the co-registration error between the products is in the order of lower than one pixel. However, the combination of images still has to account for several challenges, e.g., inhomogeneous radiometry such as illumination conditions, different content such as changed agriculture or forestry, and undesired objects such as clouds in the images (Bignalet-Cazalet et al 2012). Two major strategies for combining data are typically distinguished.…”
Section: Mosaicking Of High-resolution Multi-spectral Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the existing publications are reviewed, it can be summarized that Lamard et al (2004), Baudoin (2004), Lussy et al (2005), Baillarin et al (2006), Baillarin et al (2010), Panem et al (2012), Gleyzes et al (2012), and Boissin et al (2012) define the system, and present the specifications; Lussy et al (2005), J. M. , Lussy et al (2012), Greslou et al (2012) present the geometric properties; Lebegue et al (2010), Blanchet et al (2012), Lebègue et al (2012), Latry et al (2012), Fourest et al (2012) and Poli et al (2013) evaluate the radiometric quality; Delaunay et al (2008) mentions about the image compression algorithms; Bernard et al (2012) and Poli et al (2013) focuses on the DEM (Digital Elevation Model) generation and validation; Flamanc and Maillet (2005) study the 3D city modelling using the simulated images; Lachérade et al (2012) presents the in-flight calibration results, and Bignalet-Cazalet et al (2012) experience the mosaicking performances. Beaumet et.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%