2015
DOI: 10.1080/10798587.2015.1012849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Analysis of Dot Blot Images

Abstract: This paper presents a method for the automatic analysis of macroarray (dot blot) images. The system developed receives as input a dot blot image, corrects it for grid rotation, identifies the visible markers and provides an evaluation of the status of each marker (ON/OFF). Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the detection and classification stages. A total of 222 test images were produced from 6 original dot blot images, with various rotations, translations, contrast and noise level. Over 7500 markers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a dedicated image analysis software previously described (Caridade et al, 2015), the dot blot results were converted in probability values of each dot being a positive result (Table 3). To ensure high confidence, only probability values higher than 0.5 were considered positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a dedicated image analysis software previously described (Caridade et al, 2015), the dot blot results were converted in probability values of each dot being a positive result (Table 3). To ensure high confidence, only probability values higher than 0.5 were considered positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization with the labeled probes was carried out overnight at 68°C with washing and detection steps carried out according to the DIG system recommendations (Roche). A Molecular Imager Chemi Doc system (Bio Rad) was used to acquire the dot blot images, which were quantified using a custom-made image analysis software (Caridade et al, 2015). The results obtained with this software, which outputs the probability of each dot being a positive hybridization signal, were used to calculate the average probability values obtained for each probe/strain DNA combination (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure time was measured using algorithms in MATLAB (https: / / www .mathworks .com/ products/ matlab .html) according to pixel saturation based on the saturation of a control dot, described in more detail in Marcal et al (2018). A probabilistic number was assigned to each dot based on the control dots, representing the hybridization signal for the combination of the S. uberis DNA sample and the known DNA probe (Caridade et al, 2015). Probability values greater than 0.5 were con-sidered positive, and the dot blot patterns were created according to the number of positive values.…”
Section: Dot Blot Hybridization and Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of dot blot data was performed using an algorithm developed to automatically process the hybridization results obtained with a ChemiDoc imager. Briefly, this software adjusts each image to a user-defined grid and outputs the probability value of each dot being a positive result when compared to the positive and negative controls present in each membrane (Caridade et al, 2015). Therefore, the hybridization results can be converted into numerical values, which allows for a more robust analysis when compared to visual assessment of data.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Hybridization Datamentioning
confidence: 99%