1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19980228)41:4<739::aid-nme309>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic 3-D mode I crack propagation calculations with finite elements

Abstract: An algorithm is presented which allows for fully automatic linear elastic low cycle fatigue (LCF) crack propagation calculations of mode I plane cracks in large structures by means of the finite element technique. The bulk of the algorithm consists of an automatic procedure to introduce the geometry of a plane crack with an arbitrary crack front in an existing three-dimensional (3-D) mesh. Once the K-distribution for the initial crack has been calculated, the use of the superelement technique reduces the compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the coupled method, the fast marching method maintains the location and motion of the crack front via signed distance functions, whereas the X-FEM is used to compute the local front velocity. In keeping with standard level set notation, we use in three dimensions are: finite element methods [12,13], boundary element-based techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19], and boundary integral equations [20,21]. Gao and Rice [22] and Lai et al [23] used perturbation analysis to study planar and non-planar cracks, whereas Lazarus and coworkers [24][25][26] conducted planar crack growth simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the coupled method, the fast marching method maintains the location and motion of the crack front via signed distance functions, whereas the X-FEM is used to compute the local front velocity. In keeping with standard level set notation, we use in three dimensions are: finite element methods [12,13], boundary element-based techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19], and boundary integral equations [20,21]. Gao and Rice [22] and Lai et al [23] used perturbation analysis to study planar and non-planar cracks, whereas Lazarus and coworkers [24][25][26] conducted planar crack growth simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Complexity in cracking algorithm: it is a significant task for researchers to find an effective and practical cracking algorithm, such as finite element method (FEM) [4][5][6], discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) and numerical manifold method (NNM) [7], etc. However, each algorithm has its pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, FEM is initially a method for continuum, and only after appropriate revisions can it be used to deal with the problem of cracking simulation. The revision way can be classified into two catalogues: contact element without thickness [5,6], and thin joint element [7]. However, neither of the two types of elements can be directly used to simulate the effects of cracking process and chemical grouting in the Xiaowan arch dam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%