2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Volumetric Analysis of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A single, short session can permit delivery of it prescribed single focal dose equivalent to multiple sessions of fractionated external irradiation, while also minimizes radiation dose to the neighboring healthy tissue. [ 22 ] The objective of the following pilot study was to assess the clinical benefit of combining repeat resection of recurrent GBM with IBEB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single, short session can permit delivery of it prescribed single focal dose equivalent to multiple sessions of fractionated external irradiation, while also minimizes radiation dose to the neighboring healthy tissue. [ 22 ] The objective of the following pilot study was to assess the clinical benefit of combining repeat resection of recurrent GBM with IBEB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among fully automated approaches for residual tumour segmentation, Meier et al 25 used an end-to-end machine learning based algorithm with a performance comparable to a human rater. Krivoshapkin et al 57 used an automated tool based on a mathematical model and showed that automatically measured residual tumour burden was a significant predictor of OS ( p -value < 0.001). While our analysis did not involve segmentation, we were able to demonstrate the high performance of MET-PET in detecting residual tumour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В рамках третьего этапа (дополнительная модификация инструмента) была определена финальная версия вопросов с позиции клинического объединения схожих вопросов и оценки статистической валидации (допустимости) такого объединения. В основе математического анализа лежало вычисление (по показателю АС/СО) между сходными вопросами коэффициента корреляции Пирсона с последующей качественной оценкой полученных коэффициентов на основе шкалы Чеддока (показателя тесноты связи) [16]. Полученные данные показали, что в одном из 8 случаев объединение вопросов не представлялось возможным, в остальных случаях объединение позволило сформировать финальную версию оценки КЖ пациента при КЗС, включающую 22 вопроса.…”
Section: результатыunclassified