2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated versus subjective assessment of spatial and temporal MRI small bowel motility in Crohn's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar velocities to the in vivo observations are because the floating particle at low viscosity media, something that reflects the low viscosity of the enema normally used in in vivo studies, is located at the central axis (Figure 8), which is the area at which a particle will face the maximum fluid velocities. In addition, these fast retrograde flow velocities were also observed in vivo during the MRI measurements of the stomach and small bowel motility have been the subject of various studies since the late 1990s [37], developing to now include automated analysis of the data generated [38]. Some of these methods have shown the potential for clinical translation, e.g., motility alternations and patient-reported symptoms [39].…”
Section: Assessing Particle Motion In Dcm Using Peptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similar velocities to the in vivo observations are because the floating particle at low viscosity media, something that reflects the low viscosity of the enema normally used in in vivo studies, is located at the central axis (Figure 8), which is the area at which a particle will face the maximum fluid velocities. In addition, these fast retrograde flow velocities were also observed in vivo during the MRI measurements of the stomach and small bowel motility have been the subject of various studies since the late 1990s [37], developing to now include automated analysis of the data generated [38]. Some of these methods have shown the potential for clinical translation, e.g., motility alternations and patient-reported symptoms [39].…”
Section: Assessing Particle Motion In Dcm Using Peptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…MRI measurements of the stomach and small bowel motility have been the subject of various studies since the late 1990s [37], developing to now include automated analysis of the data generated [38]. Some of these methods have shown the potential for clinical translation, e.g., motility alternations and patient-reported symptoms [39].…”
Section: Assessing Particle Motion In Dcm Using Peptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the input of the proposed CD detection system consisted of a varying number of cine MRE series. The use of only a single MRE series for motility assessment has been dominant in the related literature 7,15,17,19,20 and some studies have reported it as a limitation. 19,20 The main result of this paper was that the system could detect CD from cine MRE series with relatively high confidence in dataset 1 but not in datasets 2 or 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of only a single MRE series for motility assessment has been dominant in the related literature 7,15,17,19,20 and some studies have reported it as a limitation. 19,20 The main result of this paper was that the system could detect CD from cine MRE series with relatively high confidence in dataset 1 but not in datasets 2 or 3. The best mean AUC score achieved with datasets 2 and 3 was only 0.54.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in this study we visually assessed motility, luminal diameter and content to evaluate the influence of these factors on the conventional motility score. An experienced abdominal radiologist reviewed these aspects, however visual assessment of motility remains difficult and has shown poor interobserver agreement in Crohn’s patients 23 making it an imperfect reference standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%