2019
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/610/1/012027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated vehicle detection in satellite images using deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, our model's mAP is similar to models trained on aerial images from other research. The Multi-Scale CNN by Guo et al [43] achieves a mAP of 89.6%, the Faster R-CNN and SSD models by Mansour et al [45] achieve 89.2% and 84.2% and the YOLO based model by Haroon et al [44] achieves 60.9%. However, most objects detected in these studies are significantly larger and therefore easier to detect for a CNN than many small ACC condensers in our study [43,44,45].…”
Section: Detection Of Air-cooled Condensers and Cooling Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, our model's mAP is similar to models trained on aerial images from other research. The Multi-Scale CNN by Guo et al [43] achieves a mAP of 89.6%, the Faster R-CNN and SSD models by Mansour et al [45] achieve 89.2% and 84.2% and the YOLO based model by Haroon et al [44] achieves 60.9%. However, most objects detected in these studies are significantly larger and therefore easier to detect for a CNN than many small ACC condensers in our study [43,44,45].…”
Section: Detection Of Air-cooled Condensers and Cooling Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a computer model learns how to process given data in order to make predictions for unseen data [41]. This technique is already frequently used to efficiently solve time consuming tasks such as detecting water wells, storage tanks, various vehicles, planes, boats, and certain buildings within satellite and aerial images [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. In addition, previous studies detected CTs to support the investigation of Legionnaires' disease outbreaks in the US [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferdous et al [12] introduced prediction speed criteria in 2019 and argued that Regions-CNN (RCNN) [17], Fast-RCNN [16], and Faster-RCNN [47] are incompatible for real-time applications due to slow multistage regional-proposal based approach. End-to-end detection-based methods like You Only Look Once (YOLO) [46] and Single Shot Detectors (SSD) [34], where suggested to increase prediction speed, yet compromising on accuracy (only 89.21%) [38]. An alternative fully convolutional neural network was proposed by Shelhamer et al [51] that combined features from complementary resolution levels (contextual and spatial information).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of object detection methods were compared using deep learning models such as Vgg16, ResNet-101, Inception-Resnet-v2 (Jiao et al, 2019). In a study conducted for vehicle detection, Vgg-16 and Inception-V2 were used and the success rates were found to be over 80% (Mansour et al, 2019). There is no sample comparing the performance of deep learning models according to the application results in the studies conducted.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 5-class object detection study using images with 30cm and 4.8m width, it was observed that the mAP value was 0.53 in images with a width of 30cm, while this performance decreased to 0.11 in images with 4.8m (Shermeyer&Van Etten, 2019). In a study for vehicle detection, Vgg-16 and Inception-V2 were used and the success rates were found to be over 80% (Mansour et al, 2019). There is no sample comparing the performance of deep learning models according to the results of the application in the studies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%