The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2010
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2010.517740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated, Unobtrusive, Action-by-Action Assessment of Self-Regulation During Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System

Abstract: Assessment of students' self-regulated learning (SRL) requires a method for evaluating whether observed actions are appropriate acts of self-regulation in the specific learning context in which they occur. We review research that has resulted in an automated method for context-sensitive assessment of a specific SRL strategy, help seeking while working with an intelligent tutoring system. The method relies on a computer-executable model of the targeted SRL strategy. The method was validated by showing that it c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Trace methodologies from think aloud protocols (Greene, Robertson, and Costa 2011) and sequenced, computer-generated logs of learner behaviors are increasingly common (Aleven et al 2010;Azevedo et al 2010;Graesser and McNamara. 2010;Greene and Azevedo 2010;Kinnebrew et al 2013a;Molenaar and Järvelä 2014;Sha, Looi, Chen, Seow, and Wong 2012;Winne and Hadwin 2013).…”
Section: Methodology and Design Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trace methodologies from think aloud protocols (Greene, Robertson, and Costa 2011) and sequenced, computer-generated logs of learner behaviors are increasingly common (Aleven et al 2010;Azevedo et al 2010;Graesser and McNamara. 2010;Greene and Azevedo 2010;Kinnebrew et al 2013a;Molenaar and Järvelä 2014;Sha, Looi, Chen, Seow, and Wong 2012;Winne and Hadwin 2013).…”
Section: Methodology and Design Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the other end of this continuum are studies that select a small set of SRL processes and examine them closely in the context of a single learning task. These types of studies usually capture SRL events (Winne and Perry 2000) using process-oriented methodological approaches like microanalytic methods (Cleary 2011), think aloud protocols (Greene et al 2011), and trace methodologies (Aleven et al 2010;Azevedo et al 2013) to observe individual SRL processes as they unfold during learning.…”
Section: Design Choices In Self-regulated Learning Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of immediate feedback was associated with decreasing metacognitive performance, and this decline was not prevented when students were provided with other metacognitive scaffolds. Aleven, Roll, McLaren, and Koedinger (2010) sought to evaluate students' self-regulated learning (SRL) in the context of an intelligent tutoring system -a tricky proposition. An automated method for context-sensitive assessment of specific SRL strategies (e.g., help seeking) has been developed.…”
Section: Information Technology and Peer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%