2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2020.2974499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Tortuosity Analysis of Nerve Fibers in Corneal Confocal Microscopy

Abstract: Precise characterization and analysis of corneal nerve fiber tortuosity are of great importance in facilitating examination and diagnosis of many eye-related diseases. In this paper we propose a fully automated method for image-level tortuosity estimation, comprising image enhancement, exponential curvature estimation, and tortuosity level classification. The image enhancement component is based on an extended Retinex model, which not only corrects imbalanced illumination and improves image contrast in an imag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 A number of measures have been defined with respect to different criteria, such as the length-based, [17][18][19] the angle-based, 12,13,15,20 and the curvature-based measures. 14,21 It is worth noting that most of these existing measures are designed for quantifying specific anatomical structures (such as retinal vessel, 17 intracerebral vasculature, 18 and corneal nerve 22 ). As such, there is no universal agreement as to which standard or measure to apply for when quantifying the tortuosity of nerve fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,16 A number of measures have been defined with respect to different criteria, such as the length-based, [17][18][19] the angle-based, 12,13,15,20 and the curvature-based measures. 14,21 It is worth noting that most of these existing measures are designed for quantifying specific anatomical structures (such as retinal vessel, 17 intracerebral vasculature, 18 and corneal nerve 22 ). As such, there is no universal agreement as to which standard or measure to apply for when quantifying the tortuosity of nerve fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition and measurement of tortuosity has been extensively studied on medical 13,14 and other forms of images in the literature 15,16 . A number of measures have been defined with respect to different criteria, such as the length‐based, 17–19 the angle‐based, 12,13,15,20 and the curvature‐based measures 14,21 . It is worth noting that most of these existing measures are designed for quantifying specific anatomical structures (such as retinal vessel, 17 intracerebral vasculature, 18 and corneal nerve 22 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make the tortuosity measurement more robust, the method is also invariant to scaling, rotation, and translation [6] in the clinical scence. Our previous work [28] evaluated the tortuosity assessment on the Retinex-based nerve fiber enhancement image. Therefore, an automatic and accurate measurement method is needed to evaluate the curvature of the curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle these problems, this paper introduces a new reliable framework for tortuosity assessment, which can conquer the human subjective error and metric variations. In addition, compared with the previous work [28], we evaluate the tortuosity assessment both on the nerve fiber and retinal vessel image based on the local phase tensor enhancement in order to verify the robustness of the method. Most of the tortuosity metrics are evaluated quantitatively on the dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I N THE above article [1], there were two errors in the printed article that the authors want to correct. 2) In Section II-D, "Implementation Details" (p. 2728), the second sentence "The whole process is repeated until the difference between R k and R k+1 is smaller than 0.001."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%