Automated swept-angle bistatic scattering measurements using continuous wave radar

Cote, Marc G.

doi:10.1109/imtc.1991.161547

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some interesting ideas can be found in these studies, but in the case of scattering measurements we may also be faced with different types of errors. Some papers have provided useful information on different experimental errors for the scattering measurements in the monostatic case [Baggett and Thomas, 2005;Muth et al, 2005] and in the bistatic case [Meaney et al, 1995;Coté, 1992;Gustafson, 1996;Fang, 2004]. One of our aims here is to provide a detailed analysis of the major error sources which can disturb the field in multistatic scattering measurements.…”

Section: Study Of the Experimental Errorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of a bistatic microwave scattering measurement setup: From high to low scattering targets

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measurement accuracy is a key point when dealing with microwave scattering measurements of 3‐D targets. This is even more drastic when the targets are small compared to the wavelength. In order to be able to fully exploit a 3‐D spherical multistatic setup and to measure the scattering pattern from 3‐D targets in copolarization and in cross polarization, a detailed analysis of the experimental errors that disturb the scattered field was carried out, and a measurement methodology was derived. Such analysis was performed in the anechoic chamber of Institut Fresnel in Marseille, France. So far, our institute has provided experimental scattered fields in the microwave domain for 2‐D targets. We can now provide 3‐D ones thanks to the analysis presented below. The influence of each error is discussed in this paper, and solutions are proposed to correct for systematic errors, positioning errors, as well as for drift problems. In addition, random errors are characterized, providing confidence intervals for each measurement.

show abstract