2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70709-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated segmentation and spatial registration of white matter lesions in MR FLAIR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLAIR images were normalized into the gray matter DARTEL space by co-registering the original FLAIR and T1 scans using the SPM5 mutual information function and then applying the DARTEL normalization parameters to the FLAIR images. WMH were defined as clusters of at least two adjacent voxels across two image sections that had at least a 30% increase in signal intensity relative to the mean of the white matter signal (Trebbe et al, 2009 ) within the 50% probability DARTEL white matter template. The intra- and inter-rater reliability for the volume of labeled WMH was Cronbach's α = 0.93 and 0.90, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FLAIR images were normalized into the gray matter DARTEL space by co-registering the original FLAIR and T1 scans using the SPM5 mutual information function and then applying the DARTEL normalization parameters to the FLAIR images. WMH were defined as clusters of at least two adjacent voxels across two image sections that had at least a 30% increase in signal intensity relative to the mean of the white matter signal (Trebbe et al, 2009 ) within the 50% probability DARTEL white matter template. The intra- and inter-rater reliability for the volume of labeled WMH was Cronbach's α = 0.93 and 0.90, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%