2014
DOI: 10.1159/000365944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Screening of Conventional Gynecological Cytology Smears: Feasible and Reliable

Abstract: Objectives: We tested the ability of automated screening in processing conventional gynecological cytology smears and its efficacy in assessing sample adequacy and stratifying cases for risk of malignancy. Study Design: Cases were retrospectively selected, including unsatisfactory samples and slides with various sorts of artifacts. Automated screening was performed using the FocalPoint GS Imaging System (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA), with classification into five quintiles. For agreement purpos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a number of recent publications have clearly demonstrated that LBC offers increased indexes of cytology positivity, and a consistent and remarkable reduction of unsatisfactory preparations [9,10,11,12]. Moreover, the best performance can be achieved with the use of computer-assisted screening programs, which is also feasible but not frequently employed globally with conventional Pap smears [13]. The São Paulo State Secretary of Health (SES) is responsible for the collection and analysis of approximately 2.5 million Pap tests per year, and the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo - FOSP (with the third-largest volume) performs about 250,000 of these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of recent publications have clearly demonstrated that LBC offers increased indexes of cytology positivity, and a consistent and remarkable reduction of unsatisfactory preparations [9,10,11,12]. Moreover, the best performance can be achieved with the use of computer-assisted screening programs, which is also feasible but not frequently employed globally with conventional Pap smears [13]. The São Paulo State Secretary of Health (SES) is responsible for the collection and analysis of approximately 2.5 million Pap tests per year, and the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo - FOSP (with the third-largest volume) performs about 250,000 of these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods trying to solve these problems have been developed [1113]; however, there are only a few studies that have been conducted on conventional smears. They often point to a high percentage of cases eliminated for further automatic analysis due to the difficulties mentioned above [14, 15]. The software developed for evaluation of conventional cytological preparations are characterised by limited sensitivity [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the proprietary FocalPoint GS Imaging System (Beckton Dickinson). [ 2 ] However, in another study, the rate of flagging in this system was found to be high: only 16–17% slides are archived without review by a pathologist. [ 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on automated image analysis of conventional smears reported a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 70.3% respectively, concluding that automated analysis could analyze the majority of conventional smears. [ 2 ] Bacus et al . have patented an apparatus for automated image analysis of conventional cervical smears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%