2015 13th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2015.7333845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated scoring of Bender Gestalt Test using image analysis techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual analysis techniques include studies that attempt to analyze completed responses of graphomotor-based neuropsychological tasks such as the Necker's cube [52], ROCF [53], BGT [54], and CDT [55]. Most of these tests include geometrically inspired shapes that involve linearity, circularity, curvilinearity and angularity components, and aim at the visual-perceptual orientation of the subjects.…”
Section: Proposed Categorization Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual analysis techniques include studies that attempt to analyze completed responses of graphomotor-based neuropsychological tasks such as the Necker's cube [52], ROCF [53], BGT [54], and CDT [55]. Most of these tests include geometrically inspired shapes that involve linearity, circularity, curvilinearity and angularity components, and aim at the visual-perceptual orientation of the subjects.…”
Section: Proposed Categorization Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include various static and dynamic features specific to the objective of the study. Spatial and (a) CDT [28] (b) ROCF [144] (c) Handwriting [29] (d) Shape [57] (e) Spiral [74] (f) BGT sample [54] Fig. 2 Examples of visual and procedural graphomotor-based neuropsychological tests used in AI systems geometric features are extracted at the component-level or globally.…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation compared algorithmic and expert assigned scores in a cohort of 1,315 outpatients and concluded that the program exhibited a comparative scoring accuracy of 98.54% (Chen et al, 2020). Similarly, Moetesum et al (2015) applied an automated approach to assessing performance on the Bender Gestalt Test (Koppitz, 1964) within a sample of 18 healthy adults. The performance of this program varied dramatically depending on the specific gestalt component being assessed [range = 6/18 (overlap) and 18/ 18 (rotation); Moetesum et al, 2015].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Moetesum et al (2015) applied an automated approach to assessing performance on the Bender Gestalt Test (Koppitz, 1964) within a sample of 18 healthy adults. The performance of this program varied dramatically depending on the specific gestalt component being assessed [range = 6/18 (overlap) and 18/ 18 (rotation); Moetesum et al, 2015].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%