2016
DOI: 10.3791/54604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells

Abstract: This manuscript describes the introduction of cell guidance features followed by the direct delivery of cells to these features in a hydrogel bioink using an automated robotic dispensing system. The particular bioink was selected as it allows cells to sediment towards and sense the features. The dispensing system bioprints viable cells in hydrogel bioinks using a backpressure assisted print head. However, by replacing the print head with a sharpened stylus or scalpel, the dispensing system can also be employed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the general trends of increased extrusion pressure and alginate concentration resulting in decreased cell viability prediction values correlates with findings in previous literature that indicate increasing alginate concentration results in decreased cell viability [21][22][23]. In other cases, trends of predicted values oppose what is seen in the literature [24,25]. These trends include: (1) decreased cell viability with increasing nozzle diameter, (2) increased cell viability with increasing gelatin concentration, and (3) larger filament diameter in DMEM-based bioink compared to saline solution-based bioink.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, the general trends of increased extrusion pressure and alginate concentration resulting in decreased cell viability prediction values correlates with findings in previous literature that indicate increasing alginate concentration results in decreased cell viability [21][22][23]. In other cases, trends of predicted values oppose what is seen in the literature [24,25]. These trends include: (1) decreased cell viability with increasing nozzle diameter, (2) increased cell viability with increasing gelatin concentration, and (3) larger filament diameter in DMEM-based bioink compared to saline solution-based bioink.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Additive manufacturing techniques or 3D printing have emerged as useful approaches in tissue engineering to fabricate cell supporting scaffolds [11]. Indeed, 3D printing has been shown to generate features that influence the behavior of the seeded cells such as the printing of cell aligning features [12][13][14]. Such 3D printed cell aligning grooves and channels are usually fabricated from stiff synthetic polymers by extruding the polymer in a molten state or dissolved in volatile solvents, thus allowing rapid post deposition setting through cooling or solvent evaporation, respectively [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method consists of four main steps: (a) the injection of the fibrin components including the cells into the silicone tube, (b) the gelation process, (c) the ejection of the gel after polymerization and (d) the stretching of the resulting fiber. We expect that already existing solutions for automated pipetting, handling, collection, gripping of samples and controlled linear displacement could be assembled to create an ad‐hoc automated system for the production of the fibers in a sterile, closed environment (Bhuthalingam, Lim, Irvine, & Venkatraman, ; Bartolo, Domingos, Gloria, & Ciurana, ; P. F. Costa et al, ; Kikuchi et al, ; Mekhileri et al, ). A GMP conform production is facilitated by the limited number of parts in contact with the materials composing the fibers and the commercial availability of GMP‐conform cell‐work stations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%