Purpose
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence
tomography angiography (OCTA) in the detection of choroidal
neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Design
Prospective case series.
Subjects
Prospective series of seventy-two eyes were studied, which included
eyes with treatment-naive CNV due to AMD, non-neovascular AMD, and normal
controls.
Methods
All eyes underwent OCTA with a spectral domain (SD) OCT (Optovue,
Inc.). The 3D angiogram was segmented into separate en face
views including the inner retinal angiogram, outer retinal angiogram, and
choriocapillaris angiogram. Detection of abnormal flow in the outer retina
served as candidate CNV with OCTA. Masked graders reviewed structural OCT
alone, en face OCTA alone, and en face
OCTA combined with cross-sectional OCTA for the presence of CNV.
Main Outcome Measure
The sensitivity and specificity of CNV detection compared to the gold
standard of fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT was determined for
structural SD-OCT alone, en face OCTA alone, and with
en face OCTA combined with cross-sectional OCTA.
Results
Of 32 eyes with CNV, both graders identified 26 true positives with
en face OCTA alone, resulting in a sensitivity of
81.3%. Four of the 6 false negatives had large subretinal hemorrhage
(SRH) and sensitivity improved to 94% for both graders if eyes with
SRH were excluded. The addition of cross-sectional OCTA along with
en face OCTA improved the sensitivity to 100%
for both graders. Structural OCT alone also had a sensitivity of
100%. The specificity of en face OCTA alone was
92.5% for grader A and 97.5% for grader B. The specificity
of structural OCT alone was 97.5% for grader A and 85% for
grader B. Cross-sectional OCTA combined with en face OCTA
had a specificity of 97.5% for grader A and 100% for grader
B.
Conclusions
Sensitivity and specificity for CNV detection with en
face OCTA combined with cross-sectional OCTA approaches that of
the gold standard of FA with OCT, and it is better than en
face OCTA alone. Structural OCT alone has excellent sensitivity
for CNV detection. False positives from structural OCT can be mitigated with
the addition of flow information with OCTA.