2014
DOI: 10.5603/nmr.2014.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated quantification with BRASS reduces equivocal reporting of DaTSCAN (123I-FP-CIT) SPECT studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between-groups (PD vs CG) differences were evaluated by univariate General Linear Model, considering age and gender as nuisance variables. Statistical threshold was set at p<0.05 18, 22 .Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8 Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/); 123 I-FP-CIT template from 30 healthy controls 36 was used for normalization process. Individual 123 I-FP-CIT data were realigned, spatially normalized to 123 I-FP-CIT template in Montreal Neurological Institute space and smoothed (3D Gaussian filter with 8 mm Full Width at Half Maximum).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Between-groups (PD vs CG) differences were evaluated by univariate General Linear Model, considering age and gender as nuisance variables. Statistical threshold was set at p<0.05 18, 22 .Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8 Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/); 123 I-FP-CIT template from 30 healthy controls 36 was used for normalization process. Individual 123 I-FP-CIT data were realigned, spatially normalized to 123 I-FP-CIT template in Montreal Neurological Institute space and smoothed (3D Gaussian filter with 8 mm Full Width at Half Maximum).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between-groups (PD vs CG) differences were evaluated by univariate General Linear Model, considering age and gender as nuisance variables. Statistical threshold was set at p<0.05 18, 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both techniques are operator dependent and may introduce small degrees of variability in reporting of results. More recently automated quantification with proprietary computer software has been applied, and this offers the possibility of reducing the rate of equivocal reporting of 123 I FP-CIT SPECT scans [16].…”
Section: Interpretation Of 123 I Fp-cit Spect Scan Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of sophisticated fully automated commercial 123 I-FP-CIT software packages [2][3][4][5][6], combined with greater awareness in the nuclear medicine community of "balanced loss" of dopaminergic function, particularly in DLB, has increased interest in quantification for FP-CIT imaging [7]. Balanced loss can be challenging for the non-expert to identify visually as images are scaled to maximum uptake rather than to a predefined absolute uptake level; low striatal binding ratio (SBR) values for striata with otherwise normal appearance are therefore useful for identifying global loss of uptake.…”
Section: Introduction 123mentioning
confidence: 99%