1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.1145585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated polarimeter–macroscope for optical mapping of birefringence, azimuths, and transmission in large area wafers. Part II. Measurement setup and results

Abstract: In the first part of this work (see preceding paper) the theory of the method lying upon a novel concept of birefringence, azimuths, and transmission mapping in large area (up to 6 in. diameter) wafers has been presented. The arrangement consisting of two HR-type linear polarizers rotated simultaneously by a stepper motor versus an immobile wafer and using a video frame grabber (VFG)/TV camera detecting system is capable of collecting data and plotting the three maps within a fraction of a minute. A detailed e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no room here to show results of other experiments carried out on these samples, also using classical polariscopes and polarimeters [6,18]. The authors, however, hereby declare that neither the plain nor circular polariscope picture, as well as the (stress-induced) birefringence map [18], resemble s any map associated with the birefringence dispersion parameters described in this paper. This, however, does not mean that these maps and pictures were not in (qualitative) agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…There is no room here to show results of other experiments carried out on these samples, also using classical polariscopes and polarimeters [6,18]. The authors, however, hereby declare that neither the plain nor circular polariscope picture, as well as the (stress-induced) birefringence map [18], resemble s any map associated with the birefringence dispersion parameters described in this paper. This, however, does not mean that these maps and pictures were not in (qualitative) agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%