2016
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.3.1.014002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated pericardial fat quantification from coronary magnetic resonance angiography: feasibility study

Abstract: Pericardial fat volume (PFV) is emerging as an important parameter for cardiovascular risk stratification. We propose a hybrid approach for automated PFV quantification from water/fat-resolved whole-heart noncontrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Ten coronary MRA datasets were acquired. Image reconstruction and phase-based water-fat separation were conducted offline. Our proposed algorithm first roughly segments the heart region on the original image using a simplified atlas-based segmentation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As standard protocols do not have zero slice gap (usually 5-8 mm slice gap), this approach, as it stands, is not suitable for application to standard-of-care CMR images. Ding et al (14) propose another approach for CMR PAT quantification; they present a limited study demonstrating feasibility of a fully automated pericardial fat quantification method from water/fat-resolved whole-heart non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography. The very small sample size (n = 10) in this limited feasibility study precludes any meaningful assessment of model performance and the clinical validity of the proposed measurement is not known.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As standard protocols do not have zero slice gap (usually 5-8 mm slice gap), this approach, as it stands, is not suitable for application to standard-of-care CMR images. Ding et al (14) propose another approach for CMR PAT quantification; they present a limited study demonstrating feasibility of a fully automated pericardial fat quantification method from water/fat-resolved whole-heart non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography. The very small sample size (n = 10) in this limited feasibility study precludes any meaningful assessment of model performance and the clinical validity of the proposed measurement is not known.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference imaging modality for assessment of cardiac structure and function and has been used in several large population studies, including the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis ( 11 ), the Framingham Heart Study ( 12 ), and the UK Biobank (UKB) ( 13 ). Thus, CMR PAT quantification would have high utility for research, with potential for translation into clinical care; however, existing methods require dedicated acquisitions and, often, arduous manual image analysis ( 14 , 15 ), limiting their applicability to large datasets with standard sequence acquisitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we took into account not only reported results but also the number of patients the method was validated on, as well as other potential ways the results might not be representative. The vast majority of papers attempt to segment EAT and PAT on CT images, with the notable exception of Ding et al [51], who use MRI images. The papers mentioned in this review use several evaluation methods and metrics to present their segmentation results including (among others): pixel-level accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity; the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (Dice coefficient, DSC); the Jaccard index (Intersection over Union, IoU); and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can be made fully automatic by using atlas-based segmentation in place of manual initialization, as presented in Ding et al [51]. Their method works by first segmenting the heart using atlas-based segmentation.…”
Section: Traditional Image Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure has been associated with all features of the metabolic syndrome 38 . MRI can volumetrically measure EAT volume 39 , but cardiac MRI is not performed as widely as CT and EAT quantification requires tedious manual tracing, although recently described automation tools may be promising 40 . CT -contrast or non-contrast- is considered to be the gold standard, due to its spatial resolution and volumetric acquisition.…”
Section: Imaging Perivascular and Epicardial Adipose Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%