2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3003638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Pavement Crack Segmentation Using U-Net-Based Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract: Automated pavement crack image segmentation is challenging because of inherent irregular patterns, lighting conditions, and noise in images. Conventional approaches require a substantial amount of feature engineering to differentiate crack regions from non-affected regions. In this paper, we propose a deep learning technique based on a convolutional neural network to perform segmentation tasks on pavement crack images. Our approach requires minimal feature engineering compared to other machine learning techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
63
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the relatively small data size that was available for this study, the network was trained by a pre-trained model based on EfficientNet-b0 pre-trained weights that had been trained on ImageNet data set as previously described. 17 , 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relatively small data size that was available for this study, the network was trained by a pre-trained model based on EfficientNet-b0 pre-trained weights that had been trained on ImageNet data set as previously described. 17 , 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following optimization, the following training parameters were used: batch size = 4, for the network training adaptive moment estimator (ADAM) stochastic gradient based optimizer 19 was used with initial learning rate of 1e −5 , and a total of 125 epochs. The network training was initiated using a pre‐trained model (ResNet‐34‐model weights, trained on ImageNet dataset, 100 epochs), followed by fine‐tuning of the model by unfreezing the weights (additional 25 epochs), as previously described 20,21 . The dice score was used to evaluate the model during training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network training was initiated using a pre-trained model (ResNet-34-model weights, trained on ImageNet dataset, 100 epochs), followed by fine-tuning of the model by unfreezing the weights (additional 25 epochs), as previously described. 20,21 The dice score was used to evaluate the model during training. DL model evaluation: Segmentation results of the entire tumor area were evaluated using fivefold cross-validation, while ensuring that images belonging to a given patient would be allocated only within one dataset (training, validation, and testing).…”
Section: E2 Segmentation Of the Entire Tumor Volume Using DL [Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of ResNet family compared to others CNNs is its expertise on computer vision tasks, possible due to the capability of creating shortcut connections which allow the simplification of information between the layers, optimizing the training [14]. Therefore, the ResNet-34 plays an important role as in Lau et al [15], that proposes a model instructed to identify cracks in sidewalks. That's because the irregular standards and lighting conditions make the process difficult, which is mitigated by ResNet-34 functions.…”
Section: B Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%