2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one side, frequencies, contrary to mode shapes or damping ratios, are easily identified with 2 Shock and Vibration a good accuracy even from ambient vibration tests (AVT). The recent improvement and diffusion of effective automated operational modal analysis (OMA) techniques [8][9][10][11][12][13] have further contributed to elect frequencies as privileged damage detection parameter. On the other hand, natural frequencies are often not especially sensitive to local damage, while they are strongly affected by environmental and operational conditions, such as temperature, humidity [5,14], and, particularly in the case of tall structures, wind intensity [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one side, frequencies, contrary to mode shapes or damping ratios, are easily identified with 2 Shock and Vibration a good accuracy even from ambient vibration tests (AVT). The recent improvement and diffusion of effective automated operational modal analysis (OMA) techniques [8][9][10][11][12][13] have further contributed to elect frequencies as privileged damage detection parameter. On the other hand, natural frequencies are often not especially sensitive to local damage, while they are strongly affected by environmental and operational conditions, such as temperature, humidity [5,14], and, particularly in the case of tall structures, wind intensity [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often the input is not clearly known, so that output-only procedures are utilized, such as Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) in the time domain and Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) in the frequency domain. These methods have also been implemented in softwares such as ARTEMIS [9] and LEONIDA [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on automated modal parameter identification have been presented. The frequency鈥恉omain methods are generally based on the peak鈥恑dentification of the power spectral density (PSD) or the singular value decomposition of the output PSD matrix. As pointed out by Rainieri and Fabbrocino, the frequency鈥恉omain automated modal identification methods have the following limitations: The threshold鈥恇ased peak鈥恜ick property requires static settings of thresholds. A preliminary calibration phase at each new application is required. The thresholds for peak鈥恜ick are sensitive to noise. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on automated modal parameter identification have been presented. The frequency-domain methods 15,16 are generally based on the peak-identification of the power spectral density (PSD) or the singular value decomposition of the output PSD matrix. As pointed out by Rainieri and Fabbrocino, 17 the frequency-domain automated modal identification methods have the following limitations:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%