Iron Ore 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-78242-156-6.00004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated optical image analysis of natural and sintered iron ore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two major imaging techniques are currently used to characterise iron making materials: SEM (scanning electron microscopy) [5][6][7] and OIA (optical image analysis) [8][9][10][11]. Both techniques have their advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two major imaging techniques are currently used to characterise iron making materials: SEM (scanning electron microscopy) [5][6][7] and OIA (optical image analysis) [8][9][10][11]. Both techniques have their advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 for mineral segmentation by Mineral 4, reproduced from Ref. [9]), has better resolution for massive screening and better characterises porosity (for detailed comparison of the two techniques see Refs. [3,12]).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This applies as well for SEM-based systems. According to [57,58], a combined approach using OIA techniques and new mineral quantification systems (e.g., QEMSCAN) will provide the most detailed understanding of ore mineral samples characterized.…”
Section: Oia Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods applied for the mineral and textural characterization of iron ores have been proposed [24], and optical reflected light image analysis is among the most powerful ones [25][26][27]. However, it is still rare that any of those considers maghemite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%