“…Well-known examples are SYBR Green I (Ex 497 nm/Em 520 nm), DAPI (Ex 358 nm/Em 461 nm), PicoGreen (Ex 480 nm/Em 520 nm) and SYTO 9 (Ex 483 nm/Em 503 nm), which are extensively used due to their good membrane permeability and their compatibility with almost all bench-top flow cytometers [ 4 , 12 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. However, a review of the current literature revealed a wide range of discrepancies in staining methods, with varying results and limited comparability [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], highlighting the need for standardized, reproducible protocols. Moreover, only a small number of protocols give an explanation of why staining parameters such as dye concentration, staining time and temperature were chosen, or how stable the added fluorochromes were [ 16 ].…”