2013 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1109/srds.2013.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Multi-graceful Degradation: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graceful degradation is often defined in association with technology only, such as "an ideal gracefully degrading system is partitioned so that failures in non-critical subsystems do not affect critical subsystems" [8, p156]. Other definitions refer to graceful degradation specifically within the context of fault tolerant technologies [17]. For the purposes of the current literature review however, a wider definition of graceful degradation as a system-wide outcome is adopted, including elements of technology and human operators, such as the definition by [18] "to gracefully degrade, the system must maintain safety performance requirements in the presence of faults or failures while and until demand is reduced to performance levels commensurate with the degraded capabilities" [p5].…”
Section: Resilience and Graceful Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graceful degradation is often defined in association with technology only, such as "an ideal gracefully degrading system is partitioned so that failures in non-critical subsystems do not affect critical subsystems" [8, p156]. Other definitions refer to graceful degradation specifically within the context of fault tolerant technologies [17]. For the purposes of the current literature review however, a wider definition of graceful degradation as a system-wide outcome is adopted, including elements of technology and human operators, such as the definition by [18] "to gracefully degrade, the system must maintain safety performance requirements in the presence of faults or failures while and until demand is reduced to performance levels commensurate with the degraded capabilities" [p5].…”
Section: Resilience and Graceful Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes are unpredictable, they can be dramatic, and they can include malfunctioning [23], slow down [12], failures [18], and much more. Graceful degradation [31] is then introduced into the runtime system, to handle these changes and guarantee performance in the presence of uncertainty. This paper shows that graceful degradation and load-balancing can interfere with one another.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RELATED WORK The challenge of building reliable distributed systems consists in providing various safety and liveness guarantees while the system is subject to certain classes of failures. Our contribution closely relates to multi-graceful degradation [32], in which the requirements that the service guarantees vary depending on the magnitude of the failure. However, due to the conflicting nature of requirements -maintaining maximum response time and maximizing optional content served, in the presence of noisy request servicing times -brownout does not provide formal guarantees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%