The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1002/mds.29439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Motor Tic Detection: A Machine Learning Approach

Abstract: Background Video‐based tic detection and scoring is useful to independently and objectively assess tic frequency and severity in patients with Tourette syndrome. In trained raters, interrater reliability is good. However, video ratings are time‐consuming and cumbersome, particularly in large‐scale studies. Therefore, we developed two machine learning (ML) algorithms for automatic tic detection. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of state‐of‐the‐art ML approaches for automatic vide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on tic detection from videos have utilized diverse algorithms to learn spatial and temporal properties for identifying tics. Similar to our methodology, other studies [24], [25] have emphasized the significance of incorporating tic-related features, such as facial landmarks or facial action unit intensities, into the input data of the model. Selecting tic-related features contributes to achieving more interpretable results compared to the visual features extracted by deep neural networks [24], [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies on tic detection from videos have utilized diverse algorithms to learn spatial and temporal properties for identifying tics. Similar to our methodology, other studies [24], [25] have emphasized the significance of incorporating tic-related features, such as facial landmarks or facial action unit intensities, into the input data of the model. Selecting tic-related features contributes to achieving more interpretable results compared to the visual features extracted by deep neural networks [24], [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In comparison, close-up video recordings have the capacity to capture facial movements and thus are well-suited for facial tic identification. Previous studies detected facial tics from short video recordings conducted in clinical settings [23]- [25]. However, these videos provide only snapshots of the current state and lack a comprehensive representation of the natural expression of tics in everyday environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous comparable studies made use of classical supervised machine learning approach such as k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Random Forests, and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis using handcrafted features as well as deep learning approaches. [10][11][12][13] A comparison between HIVE-COTE 2.0 and the use of different algorithms on the current use case is deemed necessary in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key point detection by markerless motion analysis-also referred to as human pose estimation in the field of computer vision-can be used to process video data as an input for subsequent machine learning or deep learning models. [10][11][12][13][14] Several open-source toolbox codes facilitate key point detection based on convolutional neural networks. 15 Examples of these toolbox codes are OpenPose 16 and DeepLabCut.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%