Automated Large-Scale Culture and Medium-Throughput Chemical Screen for Modulators of Proliferation and Viability of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Neuroepithelial-like Stem Cells
Abstract:The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof-of-concept feasibility for the use of human neural stem cells (NSCs) for highthroughput screening (HTS) applications. For this study, an adherent human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived long-term, self-renewing, neuroepithelial-like stem (lt-NES) cell line was selected as a representative NSC. Here, we describe the automated large-scale serum-free culture ("scale-up") of human lt-NES cells on the CompacT SelecT cell culture robotic platform, followed by … Show more
“…While the methods for stem cell differentiation including the differentiation efficiency, scale-up, reproducibility and cost effectiveness are still being improved, several pilot compound screens using stem cell differentiated progenitor cells have been recently reported. High throughput screens with smaller compound collections have been performed in the precursor cells derived patient or normal stem cells, including neural crest stem cells (from iPSCs with familial dysautonomia, IKBKAP expression) [63], neural progenitor cells (from normal iPS cells, Wnt/β-catenin signaling) [64], neuroepithelial-like stem cells (from normal iPS cells, cell proliferation and viability) [65], and neurons (from ES cells, AMPA glutamate receptor) [66]. Additionally, several other types of human cells derived from stem cells have also been used to assess drug efficacy and evaluate compound toxicity for a small set of compounds [67,68].…”
Section: Application Of Primary Cells and Human Cells Derived From Stmentioning
The significant reduction in the number of newly approved drugs in past decade has been partially attributed to failures in discovery and validation of new targets. Evaluation of recently approved new drugs has revealed that the number of approved drugs discovered through phenotypic screens, an original drug screening paradigm, has exceeded those discovered through the molecular target-based approach. Phenotypic screening is thus gaining new momentum in drug discovery with the hope that this approach may revitalize drug discovery and improve the success rate of drug approval through the discovery of viable lead compounds and identification of novel drug targets.
“…While the methods for stem cell differentiation including the differentiation efficiency, scale-up, reproducibility and cost effectiveness are still being improved, several pilot compound screens using stem cell differentiated progenitor cells have been recently reported. High throughput screens with smaller compound collections have been performed in the precursor cells derived patient or normal stem cells, including neural crest stem cells (from iPSCs with familial dysautonomia, IKBKAP expression) [63], neural progenitor cells (from normal iPS cells, Wnt/β-catenin signaling) [64], neuroepithelial-like stem cells (from normal iPS cells, cell proliferation and viability) [65], and neurons (from ES cells, AMPA glutamate receptor) [66]. Additionally, several other types of human cells derived from stem cells have also been used to assess drug efficacy and evaluate compound toxicity for a small set of compounds [67,68].…”
Section: Application Of Primary Cells and Human Cells Derived From Stmentioning
The significant reduction in the number of newly approved drugs in past decade has been partially attributed to failures in discovery and validation of new targets. Evaluation of recently approved new drugs has revealed that the number of approved drugs discovered through phenotypic screens, an original drug screening paradigm, has exceeded those discovered through the molecular target-based approach. Phenotypic screening is thus gaining new momentum in drug discovery with the hope that this approach may revitalize drug discovery and improve the success rate of drug approval through the discovery of viable lead compounds and identification of novel drug targets.
“…In a medium-throughput screening of 1,000 compounds, 24 potential hit compounds, 5 of which increased the proliferation and/or survival of human lt-NES, have been identified. In particular, these data suggest that GSK-3 inhibition, cell cycle modulation, p38 MAP kinase inhibition, and α-adrenoceptor agonism need further investigation, because the identification of multiple hits for each mode appears to confirm their involvement in modulating cell proliferation and survival [65].…”
Section: Pluripotency and Self-renewalmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, the possibility to reprogram somatic cells into induces pluripotent cells has the potential to supply large numbers of autologous cells that are capable of differentiation into all cell lineages and may be used for transplantation. Moreover, the capacity to derive disease-specific stem cells and panels of stem cells of different genetic backgrounds opens an avenue in the field of drug discovery [65]. Considering the current inefficiency and non-specificity of reprogramming, the discovery of small molecules that modulate this phenomenon could represent an important advance in the field of regenerative medicine.…”
Embryonic stem (ES) cells, combining self-renewal ability with wide range tissue-specific cell differentiation, represent one of the most powerful model systems in basic research, drug discovery and biomedical applications. In the field of drug development, ES cells are instrumental in high-throughput/content screening (HTS/HCS) for the evaluation of large compound libraries to test biological activity and toxic properties. Since it is a high priority to test new compounds in vitro, before starting animal and human treatments, there is an increasing demand for new in vitro models that can be used in HTS/HCS to facilitate drug development. In order to achieve this objective, several methods for ES cell self-renewal or differentiation have been evaluated to assess their compatibility with HTS/HCS. This review describes protocols used to screen molecules able to maintain self-renewal or to induce differentiation in ectodermal, mesodermal, endodermal, and their derivative cell lines.
“…6,7 These assays for proliferation in neuroprogenitor cells and neurite outgrowth in NS-1 cells provide information on biological processes that were not covered in the initial ToxCast bioassay portfolio. While HCI assays for proliferation 8 and neurite outgrowth 9,10 have been used for pharmaceutical screening, they have not been widely applied to environmental chemicals. Thus, we tested the ToxCast Phase I library of compounds using these assays, and present here the initial outcomes of screening these compounds and a preliminary analysis of the data.…”
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program aims to develop rapid and cost-effective toxicity testing approaches. As part of this effort, we screened the ToxCast Phase I library of 309 chemicals using previously developed and optimized high-content imaging and analysis assays for proliferation in human ReNcell CX neuroprogenitor cells and neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Cytotoxicity was determined concurrently in both models. For the initial screening, cells were exposed in triplicate to chemicals at 40 lM for 24 (proliferation) or 96 hr (neurite outgrowth). Chemicals were deemed active if effects on any endpoint were > 3 · the standard deviation of control means. A total of 130/309 chemicals (42.1%) altered at least one of the four endpoints examined. In ReNcell CX cells, 126 (41%) of chemicals were active, and 46 (15%) were active in PC12 cells. In ReNcell CX cells, 63 chemicals selectively inhibited proliferation. In PC12 cells, only four chemicals (methyl isothiocyanate, phosalone, prodiamine, and pyridaben) selectively increased neurite outgrowth, while none selectively decreased neurite outgrowth. All active chemicals were re-tested in a concentration-response study (1 nM-40 lM) and similar results were obtained. These results demonstrate (1) high reproducibility and concordance for both assays; (2) that the sensitivity of single-concentration screening may be limited by biological variability; (3) that, for environmental compounds, cytotoxicity must be used in the interpretation of effects on selected cellular endpoints; and (4) that proliferation in human neuroprogenitor cells responds similarly to proliferation in nonneuronal human cells, but has higher specificity when concurrent cytotoxicity data are considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.