2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated landmarking and labeling of fully and partially scanned spinal columns in CT images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another option would be that the expert segmented the spinal canal to evaluate the algorithm in terms of true positives (TP) and false positives (FP). Thus, detected points within segmented spinal canal would be TP, and FP otherwise, similar to [11]. In any way, the obtained outcome in this work suggests promising results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another option would be that the expert segmented the spinal canal to evaluate the algorithm in terms of true positives (TP) and false positives (FP). Thus, detected points within segmented spinal canal would be TP, and FP otherwise, similar to [11]. In any way, the obtained outcome in this work suggests promising results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…According to Major et al [11], spine detection methods can be divided into two categories: data-driven and anatomical model-driven methods. The first approach uses minimal or no anatomical knowledge without machine learning whereas the latter learns characteristics of a training dataset as well as integrating a considerable amount of anatomical knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding the 4 cases of correction of failed labeling, our application achieved a correct labeling in 99%. Klinder [27][28][29]. Due to a user-friendly revision tool, manual correction of erroneous labeling was achieved in 22.6 s on average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they relaxed input data requirements found in the literature and labelled both full and partial spine scans. Secondly, they intended to fulfill the performance requirement for daily clinical use and developed a high throughput system capable of processing thousands of slices in just a few minutes [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%