2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2013.6738531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated identification and retrieval of moth images with semantically related visual attributes on the wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since SVM is a binary classifier and for classification of multi-class problem it has to use one over all classification for each class, SVM performs better than ANN. Comparing SVM and ANN results with SRV attributes in an automated identification system for moths [25], this classifier outperforms both SVM and ANN classifiers. In [49], classification was based on LBP and the accuracy rate in identification depends on variables such as neighbouring and radius values.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since SVM is a binary classifier and for classification of multi-class problem it has to use one over all classification for each class, SVM performs better than ANN. Comparing SVM and ANN results with SRV attributes in an automated identification system for moths [25], this classifier outperforms both SVM and ANN classifiers. In [49], classification was based on LBP and the accuracy rate in identification depends on variables such as neighbouring and radius values.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They used area, perimeter, diameter, compatibility, compactness and solidity as geometrical features, uniformity, median, entropy, variance, inertia, homogeneity and co-occurrence as texture features and Hu1 [69] and Ami1-Ami2 [26] as morphological features. Feng and Bhanu [25] developed a system which adopted semantically related visual (SRV) attributes. They claimed that shape, texture and colour may fail in validity if the images are visually complex and have semantic contents.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside mentioned semi-automated systems, there are fully automated identification systems also developed for example Digital Automated Identification System (DAISY) [18], SPecies IDentification Automated (SPIDA) [25,26], Automated Bee Identification System (ABIS) [27], Automate Identification Sarinder Kaur Dhillon, Y.M. Leong, Elham Y.K, Lim L.H.S University Malaya Malaysia Of Bees [19], Automatic Identification Of Whiteflies, Aphids And Thrips [20], Automatic Identification Of Live Moths [21], Automated Insect Identification [22,23], Automated Real-Time Dynamic Identification Of Flying And Resting Butterfly [24]. DAISY was previously tested on various types of organism such as British bumble bees [28], Costa Rican Hawkmoths [8] and British Lepidoptera: Moths [29] while SPIDA was tested mainly on Australian ground spiders [25], ABIS was tested on bees [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%