Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
North American unconventional well completion design has evolved dramatically since 2013 in an effort to keep pace with the productivity gains realized in horizontal drilling. Several trends have emerged during the current industry downturn. Among these trends are a focus on core acreage with higher yield potential, the use of longer laterals, a movement towards higher proppant loading (pounds per linear foot), an increased reliance on plug and perf techniques, and decreased stage length and perforation cluster spacing (increased perf density). As a result associated improvements in well initial production (IP) rates and estimated ultimate recoveries (EUR's) have been highlighted in oil & gas operator's quarterly shareholder's reports during 2015 and early 2016. Unconventional multi-stage completion designs have also quickly evolved along a path paralleling these trends. Horizontal well IP rates and EUR's have also been enhanced through the adoption of integrated completion designs. Recently introduced geo-engineered completions rely on cross-functional expertise and software to integrate petrophysical, geomechanical, drilling, and production data into a completion design. In cases where geo-engineered designs were used, wells showed improvements in EUR's over those associated with increased lateral lengths, proppant loading and stage counts. In one recent case using a geo-engineered design it was demonstrated that fewer stages and clusters achieved higher production than offset wells while injecting less proppant and fluid; thus achieving lower completion cost. The use of engineered workflows in tight or unconventional reservoirs is not new. Multiple case histories have been published in recent literature illustrating the use of stress variability/contrast or mechanical specific energy (MSE) to generate brittleness or other fraccability indices to group stages with similar rock characteristics. In contrast to engineered designs, newer geo-engineered designs integrate multiple inputs (attributes) to determine basin and formation-specific weighted algorithms that correlate to stage and cluster production contribution improvement. The geo-engineered approach has proven repeatable and can be accomplished even when key wireline or LWD data is not available. This paper will document how geo-engineered completion designs evolved from engineered workflows. Multiple inputs (e.g. production, wireline/LWD/mud logs, core analyses, and big data from national and state data bases) can be combined to determine stage length and perforation cluster positioning. Case studies will demonstrate that geo-engineered horizontal completion designs deliver superior well production results when compared to geometric, high-intensity plug & perf designs.
Fluids introduced into a reservoir for stimulation typically take the path of least resistance and therefore frequently go into areas where there are open flow paths. In many cases, those are neither the areas you would want to stimulate for increased production nor areas from which formation damage will need to be removed. The success of a hydraulic fracturing or an acidizing operation depends on maximizing the contact between the fracturing fluid (or acid) and intact rocks. To achieve this goal, existing fluid paths must be effectivelyplugged to divert the fluid towards intact rock for an efficient application. A typical fluid diversion application can be divided into three major steps; i.e., displacement from surface to downhole, downhole plugging/diversion and corresponding stimulation and production efficiency.The aim of this paper is to review and identify the criticalparameters controlling the downhole plugging and diversion step. In addition, an analytical solution is used for predicting minimum required concentration of solid-particulate diverting agent. The proposed model incorporates multiple operational parameters such as flow rate, fluid viscosity, particle size, and opening size. The validity of the proposed solution is checked byusing experimental testswith single slot-opening. In addition, a coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Discrete Element Method (DEM) model has also been used to verify the proposed analytical solution.The findings will have beneficial implications for acidizing, multistage hydraulic fracturing, and refracturing operations. By using a scientific approach, better understanding of the controlling parameters along with the verified analytical solution,we can better design and achieve efficient fluid diversion and necessary pressure buildup.The analytical solution verified against both experimental data and advanced numerical simulations (CFD-DEM) can significantly and reliably enhance the diversion job efficiency. Using the analytical solution along with the thorough understanding of underlying mechanisms, we can optimize the particulate system characteristics for a successful diversion process. As an example and by selecting the minimum required concentration, we can eliminate the excessive use of diverting agents, which would reduce costs and adverse effects on equipment resulting from high concentrations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.