2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated grapevine flower detection and quantification method based on computer vision and deep learning from on-the-go imaging using a mobile sensing platform under field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yield assessment can also be beneficed by this practice to reduce the fruit occlusion affected by leaves. The image acquisition could be carried out on-the-go by mobile sensing platforms moving at conventional tractor speed in in vineyards trained to a vertical shoot position (VSP) system [8,17], allowing for a rapid image processing for determining leaf occlusion rate and/or yield. The next steps towards the automation of vineyard canopy assessment using new proximal sensors were recently shown; a new system equipped with matrix-based optical RGB sensors was mounted in a tractor to assess the leaf layer number and vineyard canopy gaps [28].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yield assessment can also be beneficed by this practice to reduce the fruit occlusion affected by leaves. The image acquisition could be carried out on-the-go by mobile sensing platforms moving at conventional tractor speed in in vineyards trained to a vertical shoot position (VSP) system [8,17], allowing for a rapid image processing for determining leaf occlusion rate and/or yield. The next steps towards the automation of vineyard canopy assessment using new proximal sensors were recently shown; a new system equipped with matrix-based optical RGB sensors was mounted in a tractor to assess the leaf layer number and vineyard canopy gaps [28].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image analysis has been widely applied in viticulture for assessing crop yield [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Yield forecasting has been carried out at different phenological stages: Budburst [16], flowering [17], pea-size [10,13] and harvest [10,12]. Most of the previous works have focused on visible fruits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, this decrease in detection performance was accepted due to the high gain in runtime performance. In comparison with state-of-the-art works such as the one proposed by Palacios et al [30], which detected grape flower at the bloom with an F1 score of 73.0%, this work presented a lower detection performance. On the other hand, the tradeoff between detection performance and runtime performance was extremely satisfactory since, especially for SSD MobileNet-V1, the model could perform with a mAP up to 66.96%, performing the detection at a rate higher than 10 Hz per image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this work, the grape bunches were placed over uniform backgrounds and were separated from each other by the application of a threshold. Palacios et al [30] presented a DL-based approach where the region of interest containing aggregations of flowers was extracted using a semantic segmentation architecture. For the detection of grape bunches at more advanced growth stages, Pérez-Zavala et al [31] clustered pixels into grape bunches using shape and texture information from images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard or traditional methods retrieve limited data and produce a static prediction in a multi-step process of determining average number of clusters per vine, number of berries per cluster, and weight per cluster or berry with the growth overall 10% error greatly dependent on adequate staffing and extensive historical databases of cluster weights and yields [37] Computer vision and image processing are leading the alternative methods and are one of the most utilized techniques for attempting an early yield estimation. Still, different approaches such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), low frequency ultrasound [38], RF Signals [39], counting number of flowers [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], Boolean model application [48], shoot count [49], shoot biomass [50,51], frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar [52,53], detection of specular spherical reflection peaks [54], the combination of RGB and multispectral imagery [55] along with derived occlusion ratios, are alternative methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%