2012 IEEE 8th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2012.6194729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated fish fry counting and schooling behavior analysis using computer vision

Abstract: This paper presents an automated fish fry counting by detecting the pixel area occupied by each fish silhouette using image processing. A photo of the fish fry in a specially designed container undergoes binarization and edge detection. For every image frame, the total fish count is the sum of the area inside every contour. Then the average number of fishes for every frame is summed up. Experimental data shows that the accuracy rate of the method reaches above 95 percent for a school of 200, 400, 500, and 700 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to advances in computer vision and imaging technologies, the research of computer-aided image analysis have attracted signicant attention in aquaculture industry in recent years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. One of the main research focuses is to improve management and practices in a hatchery operation which is central to the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to advances in computer vision and imaging technologies, the research of computer-aided image analysis have attracted signicant attention in aquaculture industry in recent years [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. One of the main research focuses is to improve management and practices in a hatchery operation which is central to the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are semi-automated methods [1], [8] which requires human intervention and manually fish fry handling. Moreover, most existing fully-automated fry counting systems [2], [9], [10], [11] have not paid much attention to a problem of fry overlapping in a population image, especially when fry under investigation are allowed to swim freely, resulting in significant counting and measuring errors [9], [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, information of the blobs was used to count fish fry [7] but the size of fry needs to be kept basically the same. Similarly, the area information of the outline was used to count fish [8], but the water level must be kept shallow to avoid overlapping. By extracting seven shape features, the least square support vector machine (LSSVM) achieves 98.73% accuracy for fish fry counting [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some of the disadvantages of Fish counting using DIP, it is still a viable solution in catfish farms as it would reduce counting time, minimize fish stress, and facilitated proper financial planning [12]. Thus, to harness the benefit of DIP, one of the major issues to improve in fish counting is accuracy, which is affected by factors such as noise, overlapped and other objects other than fish in the pond [13,14]. As the DIP basically employed pixel counting, there is a problem of object recognition to substantiate which area pixel is associated with fish as noise or variation in illumination or any other object in the image could erroneously be considered as fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%