1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-6383(98)91231-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated face coding: A computer-vision based method of facial expression analysis in parent-infant interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Face shape, texture, color, and facial and scalp hair vary with sex, ethnic background, and age [6,23]. Infants, for instance, have smoother, less textured skin and often lack facial hair in the brows or scalp.…”
Section: Individual Differences Among Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Face shape, texture, color, and facial and scalp hair vary with sex, ethnic background, and age [6,23]. Infants, for instance, have smoother, less textured skin and often lack facial hair in the brows or scalp.…”
Section: Individual Differences Among Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few attempts to study their influence exist. An exception was a study by Zlochower [23]. They found that algorithms for optical flow and highgradient component detection that had been optimized for young adults performed less well when used in infants.…”
Section: Individual Differences Among Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Face shape, texture, color, and facial and scalp hair vary with sex, ethnic background, and age [29,99]. Infants, for instance, have smoother, less textured skin and often lack facial hair in the brows or scalp.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few attempts to study their influence exist. An exception was a study by Zlochower et al [99], who found that algorithms for optical flow and high-gradient component detection that had been optimized for young adults performed less well when used in infants. The reduced texture AU 1+2 AU 1+4 AU 4+5 AU 1+2+4 AU 1+2+5 AU 1+6 AU 6+7 AU 1+2+5+6+7 AU 23+24 AU 9+17 AU 9+25 AU 9+17+23+24 AU 10+17 AU 10+25 AU 10+15+17 AU 12+25 AU 12+26 AU 15+17 AU 17+23+24 AU 20+25 of infants' skin, their increased fatty tissue, juvenile facial conformation, and lack of transient furrows may all have contributed to the differences observed in face analysis between infants and adults.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%