2001
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.2.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated extraction of information on protein–protein interactions from the biological literature

Abstract: The program is available on request from the authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
187
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
187
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research is also related to the protein-protein interaction (PPI) detection [14], which focuses on discovering protein interactions mentioned in biomedical literature. In medical research, determining protein interaction pairs is crucial to understanding both the functional role of individual proteins and the organization of the entire biological process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our research is also related to the protein-protein interaction (PPI) detection [14], which focuses on discovering protein interactions mentioned in biomedical literature. In medical research, determining protein interaction pairs is crucial to understanding both the functional role of individual proteins and the organization of the entire biological process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods extract text features from sentences to construct learning models, which are then used to detect sentences that mention protein interactions. For instance, Ono et al [14] manually defined a set of syntactic rule-based features covering word and part-ofspeech patterns to represent complex sentences. Xiao et al [18] exploited maximum entropy models to combine diverse lexical, syntactic, and semantic features for PPI extraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SUISEKI system uses regular expressions, with probabilities that reflect the experimental accuracy of each pattern to extract interactions into predefined frame structures (Blaschke & Valencia, 2002). Ono et al manually defined a set of rules based on syntactic features to preprocess complex sentences, with negation structures considered as well (Ono et al, 2001). The BioRAT system uses manually engineered templates that combine lexical and semantic information to identify protein interactions (Corney et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some favour precision by focusing on very specific and well-defined interactions, like protein-protein interactions (e.g. [4][5][6][7][8]), but neglect other biological phenomenons; whereas other stress on recall by extracting general relations (e.g. [9,10]), but face precision issues originating from the important lexical diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%