2006
DOI: 10.1366/000370206777887134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Estimation of White Gaussian Noise Level in a Spectrum with or without Spike Noise Using a Spectral Shifting Technique

Abstract: Various tasks, for example, the determination of signal-to-noise ratios, require the estimation of noise levels in a spectrum. This is generally accomplished by calculating the standard deviation of manually chosen points in a region of the spectrum that has a flat baseline and is otherwise devoid of artifacts and signal peaks. However, an automated procedure has the advantage of being faster and operator-independent. In principle, automated noise estimation in a single spectrum can be carried out by taking th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 This threshold therefore is unlike the polynomial order- and filter-window specifications, wherein no such direct relationship between the specified values and an accepted convention based on well-established methodologies exist. In addition, the noise standard deviation in a spectrum (and, by implication, in a profile) can be determined automatically; 25 thus, in principle, no user input is required. In practice however, the threshold can be adjusted if the default threshold is unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 This threshold therefore is unlike the polynomial order- and filter-window specifications, wherein no such direct relationship between the specified values and an accepted convention based on well-established methodologies exist. In addition, the noise standard deviation in a spectrum (and, by implication, in a profile) can be determined automatically; 25 thus, in principle, no user input is required. In practice however, the threshold can be adjusted if the default threshold is unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the present procedure falls short of the strictest definition of baseline correction in the sense that all spectra, tested or hypothetical, are shifted upward by approximately one-half the peak-to-peak (p-p) noise level. A supplemental modification to the present work would involve employing an automated estimation of noise level and further correction of the vertical offset in the manner of Schultze et al 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more false positives could be expected by using this lower threshold, their occurrences were countered by the requirement of being coincident. We used a fully automated method 22 to determine the noise standard deviation in spectra.…”
Section: Theory and Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%