2006
DOI: 10.5589/m06-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated estimation of individual conifer tree height and crown diameter via two-dimensional spatial wavelet analysis of lidar data

Abstract: We describe and evaluate a new analysis technique, spatial wavelet analysis (SWA), to automatically estimate the location, height, and crown diameter of individual trees within mixed conifer open canopy stands from light detection and ranging (lidar) data. Two-dimensional Mexican hat wavelets, over a range of likely tree crown diameters, were convolved with lidar canopy height models. Identification of local maxima within the resultant wavelet transformation image then allowed determination of the location, he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
123
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
123
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to such studies, tree height underestimation occurs because tree tops cannot be accurately determined in analogue aerial photographs of low spatial resolution and because terrain elevations (next to the tree) cannot be read because of dense crown canopies. The underestimation of tree heights also commonly occurs with other remote sensing methods, such as the most up-to-date LiDAR technology, whether it is the height estimation of individual trees (e.g., Falkowski et al 2006, Heurich 2008, Lin et al 2012, Hunter et al 2012 or of the mean stand heights (e.g., Naesset 2002b, Coops et al 2007, Hyyppä et al 2008. The underestimations of LiDAR-estimated individual tree heights reported by above-mentioned studies ranged from 0.43 to 1.20 m, whereas underestimations of LiDAR-estimated mean stand heights ranged up to 3.30 m. The magnitude of underestimation, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to such studies, tree height underestimation occurs because tree tops cannot be accurately determined in analogue aerial photographs of low spatial resolution and because terrain elevations (next to the tree) cannot be read because of dense crown canopies. The underestimation of tree heights also commonly occurs with other remote sensing methods, such as the most up-to-date LiDAR technology, whether it is the height estimation of individual trees (e.g., Falkowski et al 2006, Heurich 2008, Lin et al 2012, Hunter et al 2012 or of the mean stand heights (e.g., Naesset 2002b, Coops et al 2007, Hyyppä et al 2008. The underestimations of LiDAR-estimated individual tree heights reported by above-mentioned studies ranged from 0.43 to 1.20 m, whereas underestimations of LiDAR-estimated mean stand heights ranged up to 3.30 m. The magnitude of underestimation, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results indicate overestimation, as illustrated by the high commission errors. There are several factors that may influence tree detection overestimates, including CHM pixel size [29], canopy shape, and canopy density [43,58]. For this study, the overestimation is mainly due to the effect of the multiple treetops, which relate to the canopy characteristics and the performance of segmented algorithm.…”
Section: Tree Matching Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IWS method involves the extended application of watershed segmentation to individual tree crown delineation by inverting a raster surface to the equivalent of individual hydrologic drainage basins [29,43,[54][55][56][57]. In this study, the CHM was inverted, which resulted in turning the peaks upside down into depressions.…”
Section: Inverse Watershed Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations