2014
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education

Abstract: Automated essay scoring systems yield scores that consistently agree with those of human raters at a level as high, if not higher, as the level of agreement among human raters themselves. The system offers medical educators many benefits for scoring constructed-response tasks, such as improving the consistency of scoring, reducing the time required for scoring and reporting, minimising the costs of scoring, and providing students with immediate feedback on constructed-response tasks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending upon the underlying technology of AES and question type, the typical sample size estimates needed range from 100 to 1,000 prescored essays (Dikli, 2006). This outcome implies that AES may be impractical in small assessment settings (Gierl et al, 2014). However, the typical examinee cohort of MCC Part I Qualifying Examination is well above the recommended sample size guidelines, thereby making this scoring framework more practical in such settings.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending upon the underlying technology of AES and question type, the typical sample size estimates needed range from 100 to 1,000 prescored essays (Dikli, 2006). This outcome implies that AES may be impractical in small assessment settings (Gierl et al, 2014). However, the typical examinee cohort of MCC Part I Qualifying Examination is well above the recommended sample size guidelines, thereby making this scoring framework more practical in such settings.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AES offers many benefits for scoring written assessments, such as improving the consistency of scoring, reducing the time required for scoring and reporting, minimizing the costs of scoring, and providing students with immediate feedback on their written responses (Weigle, 2013;Williamson, 2013). A comprehensive review on the application of AES in medical education was recently published by Gierl, Latifi, Lai, Boulais, and De Champlain (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in high-stakes exams, such as in the medical field, consistency and fairness in the testing system need to be emphasized, and using machine learning to grade exams can reduce uncertainty. Other ramifications include saving time and money by reducing the need for human markers, as well as the opportunity of giving immediate feedback to students (Gierl et al, 2014). With powerful algorithms ready to be used, it is only a matter of time before the educational system sees machines marking essays from a large variety of fields.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robotic drug‐dispensing machines are replacing pharmacists just as bank machines replaced tellers. In education, testing organisations are poised to augment human test committees with computers that generate test items and score examinations …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%