2018 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/eecsi.2018.8752726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Diagnosis System of Diabetic Retinopathy Using GLCM Method and SVM Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. The proposed framework is more compelling and proficient than different frameworks, considered in previous works, to show the signs of improvement comprehension of the exhibition of our model we have compared with the previous work of others, for instance, with [8]- [11]. In [8], the accuracy for the best case is seen as 92% while the accuracy for the current technique was 98%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. The proposed framework is more compelling and proficient than different frameworks, considered in previous works, to show the signs of improvement comprehension of the exhibition of our model we have compared with the previous work of others, for instance, with [8]- [11]. In [8], the accuracy for the best case is seen as 92% while the accuracy for the current technique was 98%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As compared by the information given above the current technique seems, by all accounts, to be giving more accurate output. The parameters used for evaluating the classifiers in this study are sensitivity, and accuracy as can be calculated by equation (11) The ROC curve which is plotted with TPR against FPR is shown in Fig. 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature will be used in the classification stage to introduce the input unit to the target output to be easier in the classification stage [27]. In this research, feature extraction process compares HOG method [28]- [30], GLCM [31]- [34], and shape feature extraction [35]- [37]. In this research, GLCM uses four parameters, namely contrast, correlation, energy, and homogeneity.…”
Section: B Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research articles have been published on detecting DR utilizing fundus images and ML methods in recent years [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In some investigations, the researchers used binary fundus image datasets, and the rest used multiclass datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%