2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of high-frequency oscillations in electrophysiological signals: Methodological advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various groups have reviewed the technical aspects of HFO detection (see e.g., 39, 64, 65). The detection of HFOs is a challenging task, mainly due to their usual low signal-to-noise ratio, their association with other epileptic activity, and the still open questions regarding their nature and definition.…”
Section: High-frequency Oscillations In the Intracranial Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various groups have reviewed the technical aspects of HFO detection (see e.g., 39, 64, 65). The detection of HFOs is a challenging task, mainly due to their usual low signal-to-noise ratio, their association with other epileptic activity, and the still open questions regarding their nature and definition.…”
Section: High-frequency Oscillations In the Intracranial Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFO detection has greatly benefitted from the development of automated detectors (see 64, for a 2016 review) (30, 54, 7376). It is well-known that visual HFO detection is very time-consuming, and the reliability of this procedure has been questioned on several occasions (16).…”
Section: High-frequency Oscillations In the Intracranial Eegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several automatic detection algorithms have been developed to overcome these problems (25,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), making it easier than ever to conduct HFO analyses. However, automatic detection algorithms are not without flaws in their own respect.…”
Section: Manual Vs Automatic Detection Of Hfosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit these numerous investigations, the detection of HFOs remains a highly debatable subject, and many aspects need to be considered. Besides technical considerations regarding the signal-to-noise ratio and data sampling (24)(25)(26), choosing the actual method of detection can be difficult. Considering the mentioned criteria (1), visual inspection requires enlarging the signal both in time scale and amplitude in order to discern these discrete events from the background EEG (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we acquired intracranial data to test the following hypotheses: 1. high frequency activity is spatially organized across processing networks, i.e., their timing and functional topography reflect either early visual or late perceptual decision processes 2. their temporal patterning reflects specific object properties, or instead just a general recognition mechanism occurring during perceptual decision-making. These remain controversial hypotheses for which ECoG provides a unique opportunity to test, even with the limitations of available mathematical models for the analysis of high-density recordings at high spatio-temporal resolutions[ 41 ]. We acquired invasive data in six patients with refractory epilepsy and also extended the range of visual categories used in previous studies by including new ambiguous stimulus categories (faces, objects and scrambled stimuli that may also activate similar decision regions) [ 42 ], allowing to test general processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%