“…In (Goldbaum et al, 1990) Mahalanobis distance is used as the classifier criteria, but results were inconclusive. Many other approximations can be found in literature, like mathematical morphology based (Cree et al, 1997;Spencer et al, 1996) or neural network based (Gardner et al, 1996), with results ranging in sensitivity from 85% and specificity of 76% (Hipwell et al, 2000), sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 88.7% in (Sinthanayothin et al, 2002) or sensitivity 93.1% and specificity of 71.4% (Larsen et al, 2003), this last obtained using a commercially available automatic red lesion detection system. More recently, García et al (García et al, 2009) developed several techniques to deal with the problem of feature detection for the diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and screening, using neural nets like the multilayer perceptron classifier (García et al, 2008) or a radial basis function fed with the output of a logistic regression process, and obtained values ranging in sensitivity from 86.1% to 92.1% and from 71.4% to 86.4% in positive predicted results.…”