1996
DOI: 10.1118/1.597756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification

Abstract: This paper presents segmentation and classification results of an automated algorithm for the detection of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Potential mass regions were first identified using density-weighted contrast enhancement (DWCE) segmentation applied to single-view mammograms. Once the potential mass regions had been identified, multiresolution texture features extracted from wavelet coefficients were calculated, and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to classify the regions as breast mass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Petrick et al 9 developed an algorithm for detection of masses by use of a region-growing technique on the objects. The system used a filter for distinction of contrast, which they used in their previous work 7 to enhance structures of mammographic interest. The region-growing-based technique was then applied to each of the identified structures, with gray scales and the gradient used to reduce the overlapping of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Petrick et al 9 developed an algorithm for detection of masses by use of a region-growing technique on the objects. The system used a filter for distinction of contrast, which they used in their previous work 7 to enhance structures of mammographic interest. The region-growing-based technique was then applied to each of the identified structures, with gray scales and the gradient used to reduce the overlapping of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was tested in a set of five images, yielding a sensitivity of 83% with 0.6 false positive per image. The wavelet transform was applied for analysis of masses, 6,7 and texture features based on the matrices of spatial graylevel dependence (SGLD) were used for each region of interest (ROI) at different scales. The best features were selected by the stepwise method and by minimization of the Mahalanobis 8 published a study on detection of malignant masses in mammograms based on a nonlinear analysis method for multiscales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the methods already developed in out lab, which work reliably for segmentation of the breast image from the background for our automated detection algorithms for single images [1], [2].…”
Section: (Task 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 We have developed a CAD system for the detection of masses on SFMs in our previous studies. 30,35,36 We are developing a mass detection system for mammograms acquired directly by a FFDM system. In this study, we adapted our mass detection system developed for SFMs to FFDMs by optimizing each stage and retraining.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their approaches to prescreening of mass candidates were based primarily on mass characteristics including: (1) asymmetric density between left and right mammograms, [19][20][21][22] (2) texture, 23,24 (3) spiculation, 25,26 (4) gray level contrast, [27][28][29][30][31] and (5) gradient. 32 Some of these approaches were refined with a combination of the mass characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%