2018
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000733
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated detection of bacterial growth on 96-well plates for high-throughput drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a photograph was taken at each time point by use of the Vizion instrument, and this was retrospectively analyzed using some bespoke plate-reading software, AMyGDA (Fig. S2) ( 18 ). For more information on the above, please see Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, a photograph was taken at each time point by use of the Vizion instrument, and this was retrospectively analyzed using some bespoke plate-reading software, AMyGDA (Fig. S2) ( 18 ). For more information on the above, please see Materials and Methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MICs measured from photographs of the UKMYC5 plates after 14 days of incubation by use of AMyGDA software (Fig. S2) ( 18 ) were then compared to MICs measured by the laboratory scientist by use of the Vizion system. As before, we consider the MICs to be in agreement if they are within a doubling dilution of one another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Images were deduplicated by checking the MD5SUM was unique. The remaining images were first read by bespoke software, AMyGDA (55, 56), which detects the locations of the wells and, by measuring the growth in each well, estimates an MIC for all drugs. For 54.7% of all measurements the MICs measured by the laboratory scientist and AMyGDA were identical (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inconspicua library fraction activity was assessed with a simple 8 straight-channel microfluidic chip (Figure 1) to explore the merits of a microfluidic bioassay format. Whereas traditional "bulk" assays (e.g., 96-well plate) often require a minimum of 50 µL of sample mixture in each well (Sarker et al, 2007;Teh et al, 2017;Fowler et al, 2018) (10 µL extract, 40 µL of media and cells for each replicate) (Kirkpatrick et al, 2017;Parsley et al, 2018Parsley et al, , 2019Moyer et al, 2019), microfluidic devices utilize sample sizes in the nanoliter/picoliter range. However, connectors and interfaces between microfluidic channels/chambers and injection sites can generate significant dead volume, requiring excess sample to ensure complete filling of microfluidic compartments.…”
Section: Bioactivity In Microfluidic Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%